|
|
(a) celebrating the success of local campaigns despite the drain caused by the east coast relief efforts, or (b) telling horror stories of campaigns derailed by those relief efforts. I will do neither. Suffice it to say that there is voluminous evidence on both sides, and we will not have a quantitative handle on the impact of September 11th on philanthropy until next spring at the earliest. What interests me more is the issue of nonprofit morale in the face of the terrorist attacks and a faltering economy. As some of you know, my first rule of fundraising is: "The biggest problem in fundraising isn't getting people to give; it's getting people to ask." Even large and sophisticated development shops are exhibiting hesitation about launching campaigns this fall--in what is traditionally the most desirable time of year to raise funds for nonprofits. This hesitation is, I believe, wrong-headed: we should assume that there are charitable dollars out there, and that our donors continue to believe in the value of what we do. Let
me add an important tactical consideration concerning September 11th:
woe unto the nonprofit that ignores September 11th in its fundraising
pitches! We must anticipate prospective donors' concerns and address
them before they are articulated. It stands to reason that donors will
wonder whether their charitable dollars should go to the relief effort
or to your nonprofit. How about saying something like:
It might even be appropriate to fashion your nonprofit as a ray of hope in these troubled times:
I
am not advocating that you crudely "spin" the events of September 11th
for your own benefit. I am arguing that the kinds of services we provide
do offer a reason to believe.
Copyright 2007 Zimmerman Lehman. This information
is the property of Zimmerman
Lehman. If you would like to reprint this information,
please see our reprint
and copyright policy.
| |||||
HOME | WHAT WE DO | WHO WE ARE | OUR CLIENTS | PUBLICATIONS | FREE RESOURCES | CONTACT US | SEARCH Copyright © 2005, Zimmerman Lehman |